what is 'i' exaclty?
'i' is a imaginary concept. there are costant things like names, history. but there are also dynamics things like changing beliefs and ideas. our sense of alive comes from being awake and awakness comes from the brain that is firing neurons.
you exist if and only if your brain is alive. therefore to say that you are nothing more than your brain is not exaggerating. so I = brain?
the next question is why are we so crazy about preseveing ourselves and empowering ourselves? well our brain recognise that with more power we will have more benefits like no need to work for so long, can make people do work while we supervise them, can have sex readily, feel happy and mature most of the time. we are afraid of our own death because we realize that if we die then we will not be able to do anything we will not get to watch britney spears anymore, we cannot go for concerts cannot meet up with friends we realize that death eads to oblivious that is why we hell are afraid that we will die.
by common sense self protection, and empoering is a natural act and during the process we recognise that the common denoimator that all these comes from is our body and the image of self. when you read a book, it is you who are reading. when you meet are with friends , it is you who are meeting up. when you injure yourself, it is you. when you are feeling sad and angry it is you. when you are having sex, it is you who are having sex. the point is it always have to do with you. you are trapped in your body and the sense of self identity.
subconsciously, the image of you is being embedded in every body with respect to the own body and sense of self that naturally, the I will emerge and along with it its ego and weakness.
so what is the point i am driving at? at the end of the day we all die if the immortality method is not been found. this means that our I is limited entity. we will not go to hell or heaven or the origin consciousness of unity. this means that everyone should realize and accept the fact that they lived their life onced and once only and after which you are nothing at all.
therefore, what do we do with this sixty years of life? live life to the fullest and "seek for a calm life" is contradicting statement. so either one is right. even if either one is right. lets say live life to the fullest, it still does not give a good idea how exxaclty to live life to the fullest. is it be a active vokunteer? is it to be a vet? is it to be the most popular idol? is it to be the beat playboy who fuck the most pretty gurls on earth. therefore. to say this sentence and dun elaborate exaclty how is as good as not saying anything. also this sentence has multiple interpretation.
from how to live this sixty years, we do realize that they are many many governing concepts, ideas and theories that explains what you should you do what you should not do? for ex, being a volunteer is very wrong but opposition will claim live the life you one so anybody live differently as long as they have that sense of purpose in their life. i will say that this is a wrong statement. many purposes of life is wrong and i hav especific reasons for that. to have a sense of purpose is easy but many purposes are wrong. for example i can say that my sense of purpose in life is to conquer the whole world so by that theory i am doing something right ain't i. this proves that the statement 'to have a sense of purpose ' is wrong and sadly this is being put in many self help books.
to have a sense of purpose is only step one. to ensure that that your sense of purpose is right is then the difficulty step because you have t prove your statemnt purpose and the proving is a chain of proving that has to ensure that every thing is well expalined and form a logical, self sustainable loop. and you have to ensure that this loop you claim is everything in universe not only in a narrow minded sense. i have seen countless people , christians for example who seem to be able to explains everything sensible in their own world relative to god and jesus and to them, it is a complete loop of reasons and eliefs. but i can easily see that this loop of theirs is liek a frog in a well scenario and it is not realistic at all. to poke their hole, is not diffiuclt but there is no need to in the first place because thier satyingin their loop is to your advantage so let them stay in their loop is a wise choice. dun let your ego get over you as you try to convince them to get out of their opwn lop and makes you feel right and proud in the process.
by realistic, it means to account for eveything scientifically and common sense that we can verify, we can see, we can touch, observe and percieve. to include everything including the comsology , beginning of causation and space rationally. it is obvious that obtaigning all knowledge and use them is implausible but what i am telling you is that you should learn from eveything that is realistic as much as posiible because your life is submerge in this reality of comsology and smallest atoms and causation hence you have to study reality. it is for your own sake that you learn from them whatever you can. to sum things all, we must learn as widely as possible , but we also learn as deeply (specializaton) because both this breadth and depth of knowledge has its own pros and cons. butmost people are geared towards depth. they usually reach a certain breadth and for some reasons, they stop expanding maybe because they ego tells them that they are superman already so they just focus on depth and somewhere when they are comfortable they stop learning altogether and just enkoying life. but they are living a life of undetectable mistakes which they do not even realize and this is to their own disadvatnges although most of them die without knowing this fact. what i am suggesting is a lifelong learning alternating beteween depth and breath learning and they are suppose to improve your life. i dun recommend learning for nothing, they are supposed to make your life more fun, interesting and sexy. and live longer too. i dun suggest studong comsology for nothing. it has to be useful, if one day meteorit is to hit earth, and you knwo this ship that can send you to mars and live for anoteher few years then it is for your for your benefit that you have read about this ship while your study of cosmology.
god? you must be joking. eternal life if you belief in it? if it is true, i will go to sunday church every week. but read this, it is if it is true then i will go? proof? they dun have any fucking solid proof and you expect me to donate ten percent of my salary. when i mean proof it must be something i can see hear or touch, an experiment that can be done many times to verify that no human or illusion is possible and that it must be an act of supereme being. even that , you must proof that even if there is a supreme being, he must really send me to heaven for eternal bliss if i believe in him. he must be able to send me to his heaven palace to let me take this tour and enjoy that bliss that no where on earth i can experience to conclude that he really exst and will send me to his playground upon my death. see? but it there such incidents, no at all. but it is imperative that these stupid people exists for if they exist it will increase my strength in relative terms.
enough said, i shall go back to my learning.
you exist if and only if your brain is alive. therefore to say that you are nothing more than your brain is not exaggerating. so I = brain?
the next question is why are we so crazy about preseveing ourselves and empowering ourselves? well our brain recognise that with more power we will have more benefits like no need to work for so long, can make people do work while we supervise them, can have sex readily, feel happy and mature most of the time. we are afraid of our own death because we realize that if we die then we will not be able to do anything we will not get to watch britney spears anymore, we cannot go for concerts cannot meet up with friends we realize that death eads to oblivious that is why we hell are afraid that we will die.
by common sense self protection, and empoering is a natural act and during the process we recognise that the common denoimator that all these comes from is our body and the image of self. when you read a book, it is you who are reading. when you meet are with friends , it is you who are meeting up. when you injure yourself, it is you. when you are feeling sad and angry it is you. when you are having sex, it is you who are having sex. the point is it always have to do with you. you are trapped in your body and the sense of self identity.
subconsciously, the image of you is being embedded in every body with respect to the own body and sense of self that naturally, the I will emerge and along with it its ego and weakness.
so what is the point i am driving at? at the end of the day we all die if the immortality method is not been found. this means that our I is limited entity. we will not go to hell or heaven or the origin consciousness of unity. this means that everyone should realize and accept the fact that they lived their life onced and once only and after which you are nothing at all.
therefore, what do we do with this sixty years of life? live life to the fullest and "seek for a calm life" is contradicting statement. so either one is right. even if either one is right. lets say live life to the fullest, it still does not give a good idea how exxaclty to live life to the fullest. is it be a active vokunteer? is it to be a vet? is it to be the most popular idol? is it to be the beat playboy who fuck the most pretty gurls on earth. therefore. to say this sentence and dun elaborate exaclty how is as good as not saying anything. also this sentence has multiple interpretation.
from how to live this sixty years, we do realize that they are many many governing concepts, ideas and theories that explains what you should you do what you should not do? for ex, being a volunteer is very wrong but opposition will claim live the life you one so anybody live differently as long as they have that sense of purpose in their life. i will say that this is a wrong statement. many purposes of life is wrong and i hav especific reasons for that. to have a sense of purpose is easy but many purposes are wrong. for example i can say that my sense of purpose in life is to conquer the whole world so by that theory i am doing something right ain't i. this proves that the statement 'to have a sense of purpose ' is wrong and sadly this is being put in many self help books.
to have a sense of purpose is only step one. to ensure that that your sense of purpose is right is then the difficulty step because you have t prove your statemnt purpose and the proving is a chain of proving that has to ensure that every thing is well expalined and form a logical, self sustainable loop. and you have to ensure that this loop you claim is everything in universe not only in a narrow minded sense. i have seen countless people , christians for example who seem to be able to explains everything sensible in their own world relative to god and jesus and to them, it is a complete loop of reasons and eliefs. but i can easily see that this loop of theirs is liek a frog in a well scenario and it is not realistic at all. to poke their hole, is not diffiuclt but there is no need to in the first place because thier satyingin their loop is to your advantage so let them stay in their loop is a wise choice. dun let your ego get over you as you try to convince them to get out of their opwn lop and makes you feel right and proud in the process.
by realistic, it means to account for eveything scientifically and common sense that we can verify, we can see, we can touch, observe and percieve. to include everything including the comsology , beginning of causation and space rationally. it is obvious that obtaigning all knowledge and use them is implausible but what i am telling you is that you should learn from eveything that is realistic as much as posiible because your life is submerge in this reality of comsology and smallest atoms and causation hence you have to study reality. it is for your own sake that you learn from them whatever you can. to sum things all, we must learn as widely as possible , but we also learn as deeply (specializaton) because both this breadth and depth of knowledge has its own pros and cons. butmost people are geared towards depth. they usually reach a certain breadth and for some reasons, they stop expanding maybe because they ego tells them that they are superman already so they just focus on depth and somewhere when they are comfortable they stop learning altogether and just enkoying life. but they are living a life of undetectable mistakes which they do not even realize and this is to their own disadvatnges although most of them die without knowing this fact. what i am suggesting is a lifelong learning alternating beteween depth and breath learning and they are suppose to improve your life. i dun recommend learning for nothing, they are supposed to make your life more fun, interesting and sexy. and live longer too. i dun suggest studong comsology for nothing. it has to be useful, if one day meteorit is to hit earth, and you knwo this ship that can send you to mars and live for anoteher few years then it is for your for your benefit that you have read about this ship while your study of cosmology.
god? you must be joking. eternal life if you belief in it? if it is true, i will go to sunday church every week. but read this, it is if it is true then i will go? proof? they dun have any fucking solid proof and you expect me to donate ten percent of my salary. when i mean proof it must be something i can see hear or touch, an experiment that can be done many times to verify that no human or illusion is possible and that it must be an act of supereme being. even that , you must proof that even if there is a supreme being, he must really send me to heaven for eternal bliss if i believe in him. he must be able to send me to his heaven palace to let me take this tour and enjoy that bliss that no where on earth i can experience to conclude that he really exst and will send me to his playground upon my death. see? but it there such incidents, no at all. but it is imperative that these stupid people exists for if they exist it will increase my strength in relative terms.
enough said, i shall go back to my learning.

